Loading...
Loading...
Classes: Class 25
Loading summary…
US trademark data is supplied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Works of the US federal government are in the public domain under 17 U.S.C. §105.
This page is served live from the USPTO Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) API, so status, prosecution history and documents reflect the latest information returned by the USPTO at the time of your request.
Serial Number 85350006
The “About This Trademark” summary and FAQ above are AI-generated from the register data shown on this page. They are factual summaries only — always verify details against the official register before making legal decisions.
Every US trademark on file with the USPTO is a public declaration that a brand is using — or intends to use — a specific word, logo, or phrase on defined goods or services in commerce. Serial number 85350006 sits on the federal register as a reference point for competitors, attorneys, and founders running clearance on similar marks. Reading individual filings like this one in detail is one of the most direct ways to see how the USPTO treats descriptiveness, distinctiveness, and likelihood of confusion in practice — and the federal register remains the single best free signal for whether a proposed brand name has room to register without conflict.
US trademark protection is territorial, class-specific, and built on use in commerce. A registration covering FOXY USA CLOTHING CO. ALABAMA MONTGOMERY BIRMINGHAM ALABAMIAN ALASKA JUNEAU ANCHORAGE ALASKAN ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONIAN ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK ARKANSAN COLORADO DENVER ASPEN VAIL COLORADAN CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIAN CONNECTICUT HARTFORD BRIDGEPORT CONNECTICUTER DELAWARE DOVER WILMINGTON DELAWAREAN FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE JACKSONVILLE FLORIDIAN GEORGIA ATLANTA GEORGIAN HAWAII HONOLULU HAWAIIAN ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD CHICAGO ILLINOISAN INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS HOOSIER IDAHO BOISE IDAHOAN IOWA DES MOINES IOWAN KENTUCKY FRANKFORT LOUISVILLE KENTUCKIAN KANSAS TOPEKA WICHITA KANSAN LOUISIANA BATON ROUGE NEW ORLEANS LOUISIANIAN MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON BAY STATER MARYLAND ANNAPOLIS BALTIMORE MARYLANDER MISSISSIPPI JACKSON MISSISSIPPIAN MAINE AUGUSTA PORTLAND MAINER MISSOURI JEFFERSON CITY KANSAS CITY MISSOURIAN MICHIGAN LANSING DETROIT MICHIGANDER MICHIGANIAN MINNESOTA SAINT PAUL MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTAN MONTANA HELENA BILLINGS MONTANAN NEW JERSEY TRENTON NEWARK NEW JERSEYAN NEW JERSEYITE NEW YORK ALBANY NEW YORK CITY BIG APPLE NEW YORKER NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINIAN TAR HEEL NEW HAMPSHIRE CONCORD MANCHESTER NEW HAMPSHIRITE NEVADA CARSON CITY LAS VEGAS NEVADAN NEBRASKA LINCOLN OMAHA NEBRASKAN NORTH DAKOTA BISMARCK FARGO NORTH DAKOTAN NEW MEXICO SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NEW MEXICAN OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA CITY OKLAHOMAN OKIE OHIO COLUMBUS OHIOAN BUCKEYE OREGON SALEM PORTLAND OREGONIAN PENNSYLVANIA HARRISBURG PHILADELPHIA PENNSYLVANIAN PUERTO RICO SAN JUAN PUERTO RICAN RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLANDER SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA SOUTH CAROLINIAN SOUTH DAKOTA PIERRE SIOUX FALLS SOUTH DAKOTAN TENNESSEE NASHVILLE MEMPHIS TENNESSEAN TEXAS AUSTIN HOUSTON TEXAN UTAH SALT LAKE CITY UTAHAN VIRGINIA RICHMOND VIRGINIA BEACH VIRGINIAN VERMONT MONTPELIER BURLINGTON VERMONTER WISCONSIN MADISON MILWAUKEE WISCONSINITE WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON WEST VIRGINIAN WASHINGTON OLYMPIA SEATTLE EMERALD CITY WASHINGTONIAN WYOMING CHEYENNE WYOMINGITE WASHINGTON D.C. THE U.S. CAPITOL THE DISTRICT WASHINGTONIAN does not automatically extend to every variant of the mark, every related category, or every other country, which is why brand owners pair USPTO clearance with structured cross-register checks — our US trademark search covers the USPTO register, while the wider UK clearance tool, Trademark Wiki, and the cross-register matches above let you see how the same word mark looks in adjacent jurisdictions before you file. International expansion typically routes through the Madrid Protocol once a US base application is on file.
If you are evaluating a filing that touches the same goods or services class as serial 85350006, start with an exact-match and phonetic-near-match check, review the cited identification of goods against the commercial use you actually intend, and document your use-in-commerce evidence in a form a USPTO examining attorney can act on. Most US office actions turn on either a Section 2(d) likelihood-of-confusion refusal or a Section 2(e) descriptiveness refusal — both are far easier to head off with disciplined upfront clearance than they are to overcome once issued, which is where a US-qualified trademark attorney adds the most value early.